May 14, 2009
The Audacity Of Unawareness
Barack Obama, through his spokesman, claimed on April 15 that he was unaware of the tax day tea parties. Granted, the MSM has done a good job in suppressing any sort of coverage ahead of time (and the little coverage they did provide was derisive at best) . . . but how out of touch is the Community Organizer in Chief, really?This much:* He for 20 years was unaware that he was attending a church with a racist pastor who hates America.* He was unaware that he was family friends with, and started his political career in the living room of, a domestic terrorist.* He was unaware that he had invested in two speculative companies backed by some of his top donors right after taking office in 2005.* He was unaware that his own aunt was living in the U.S. illegally.* He was unaware that his own brother lives on pennies a day in a hut in Kenya.* He was unaware of the AIG bonuses that he and his administration approved and signed into a bill.* He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Commerce was under investigation in a bribery scandal.* He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of Health and Human Services was a tax cheat.** He was unaware that the man he nominated to be his Secretary of the Treasury was a tax cheat.* He was unaware that the man he nominated to be the U.S. Trade Representative was a tax cheat.* He was unaware that the woman he nominated to be his Chief Performance Officer was a tax cheat.* He was unaware that the man he nominated to be No. 2 at the Environmental Protection Agency was under investigation for mismanaging $25 million in EPA grants.For the love of God, there are people in comas that are more aware of world affairs than this guy.
Pelosi: Liar Of The House
How did America sink so very low? So very fast.
Can you say deer in the headlights. Pelosi is sweating and lying and squirming and ridiculous. But the money quote is this pathological liar is calling for a "truth comminssion". A TRUTH COMMISSION. We are living Atlas Shrugged. You don't have to read it. You are in it.
A truth commission? More obfuscation and smoke and mirrors to distract the American people from what's really happening in this country. Socialism. Bankruptcy. Dismantling of the military in the face of a savage enemy.
What a liar. First she said, We Were Not! I Repeat NOT EVER TOLD Waterboarding Was Used! Now she said she was, sorta. Once again she drags out of the corpse of BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED! NO WMD! This is pathetic.
This morally bankrupt political hack talking about American values. "Torture!" Nonsense. They saved our lives. The Democrats should all move to Tora Bora with the rest of their political soulmates. America elected these clowns. Shame on you.
Pelosi accused the CIA of lying. I cannot wait for the fallout.
Pelosi Accuses CIA Of Lying Legal Insurrection
Nancy Pelosi is holding a press conference in which she has acknowledged being briefed by the CIA about waterboarding in 2002, but accuses the CIA of lying to Congress about the use of the technique and whether the techniques were legal. Pelosi also acknowledged, when pressed by questions, that she was told in 2003 by an assistant, that the CIA was using waterboarding. This puts Pelosi and Democrats in Congress who support her on a collision course with the intelligence community.Pelosi claimed that she took action to stop the policies, by working to take control of Congress and passing legislation several years later. Pelosi also used a logical and political slight of hand by asserting that at the same time the Bush administration was misleading Congress about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.Pelosi has upped the ante, and it seems inevitable that there will be a "truth commission" to find out what the person two heartbeats from the presidency knew, and when she knew it.Updates to follow once the transcript is available. The press conference is ongoing, and the questioning is good and hard hitting, pointing out Pelosi's change in stories over time.
UPDATE: Now she says it's 2003 she knew. The truth doesn't change! (hat tip Susan)
PELOSI VS. CIA
On Drudge. I'm goin' with the CIA on this one. But that's just me.
Can you say deer in the headlights. Pelosi is sweating and lying and squirming and ridiculous. But the money quote is this pathological liar is calling for a "truth comminssion". A TRUTH COMMISSION. We are living Atlas Shrugged. You don't have to read it. You are in it.
A truth commission? More obfuscation and smoke and mirrors to distract the American people from what's really happening in this country. Socialism. Bankruptcy. Dismantling of the military in the face of a savage enemy.
What a liar. First she said, We Were Not! I Repeat NOT EVER TOLD Waterboarding Was Used! Now she said she was, sorta. Once again she drags out of the corpse of BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED! NO WMD! This is pathetic.
This morally bankrupt political hack talking about American values. "Torture!" Nonsense. They saved our lives. The Democrats should all move to Tora Bora with the rest of their political soulmates. America elected these clowns. Shame on you.
Pelosi accused the CIA of lying. I cannot wait for the fallout.
Pelosi Accuses CIA Of Lying Legal Insurrection
Nancy Pelosi is holding a press conference in which she has acknowledged being briefed by the CIA about waterboarding in 2002, but accuses the CIA of lying to Congress about the use of the technique and whether the techniques were legal. Pelosi also acknowledged, when pressed by questions, that she was told in 2003 by an assistant, that the CIA was using waterboarding. This puts Pelosi and Democrats in Congress who support her on a collision course with the intelligence community.Pelosi claimed that she took action to stop the policies, by working to take control of Congress and passing legislation several years later. Pelosi also used a logical and political slight of hand by asserting that at the same time the Bush administration was misleading Congress about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.Pelosi has upped the ante, and it seems inevitable that there will be a "truth commission" to find out what the person two heartbeats from the presidency knew, and when she knew it.Updates to follow once the transcript is available. The press conference is ongoing, and the questioning is good and hard hitting, pointing out Pelosi's change in stories over time.
UPDATE: Now she says it's 2003 she knew. The truth doesn't change! (hat tip Susan)
PELOSI VS. CIA
On Drudge. I'm goin' with the CIA on this one. But that's just me.
May 13, 2009
What's The Next Crisis Obama Must Fix?
We’ve seen through the lens of history how various Dictators used crisis and circumstances to falsely rally the people to their side, calling for reforms, national security, change, health care and new jobs. The whole time, promising to fix problems that they themselves had caused. We have heard Rham Emanuel, Hillary Clinton and other top Obama voice pieces stating proudly that “we should never waste a good crisis.” Well, they certainly don’t seem to be wasting anything do they?
What are some of these manipulated crisis that are being used to manipulate our money and freedom away?
Favorite Diversions:
“I inherited this mess from Bush” “It will take time to fix it”
Remember the whole time you swoop in to take over the ailing banking institutions to blame it all on Bush, Republican leadership and evil corporations. It has everything to do with conservative overspending, especially on a waste of time war in Iraq. Of course none of the mortgage crisis and financial melt down has anything at all to do with liberals and liberal/ democrat bills. They only care about people and needs unlike the mean spirited and racist conservatives.
Naturally, that is why flaming liberal Bill Clinton repealed the critically important Glass-Steagall Bill that had long provided proper protection, guidance and limitations to the banking institutions and lending practices. Almost overnight, at the adoring and empathetic hands of the liberal democrats, bankers were forced to offer and give loans to undeserving customers, with bad credit, who would have never fit any proper banking guidelines to get a home loan, but now, thanks to wanting to avoid the appearance of racism to the extreme and not wanting to miss serve the poor, 130% mortgages started flying out the door. These were loans the liberals were forcing our bankers to give or face the music. It didn’t take long before they could see the other shoe dropping as hundreds of thousands of clients, no millions, defaulted. Banks started sweeping sidewalks at the graveyard and now……………. “Trouble in river city” that continues.
There were other times in our brief history that our economy was being flattened and interest rates were raising up to 21%. Those were the precious days of yet another bold democratic President Jimmy Carter. His policies of huge Government showed the economy a thing or two all right. It put us in intensive care! Thank God Ronald Reagan came around when he did. He managed to put some balance and common sense back in Government and took its size back down a notch or two and soon, the interest rates came back to normal and the numbers showed growth and health again.
“I won and you didn’t”
I don’t know which one I like more, the endless blaming of Bush for everything or the reminding us all the time that he won and we didn’t. Both statements make me think of a narcissistic junior high boy having a word fight in the hallway.
The facts outside of Bush, the world economy and Republicans many vises, are:
Obama has forcibly taken over our banks. It’s on the record that many didn’t want funds and sent leadership to congress asserting their reserves. They were told you all take the money or no one gets any and you would get no more later if you needed it. Of course, they took the money. Then, it is also known, that many came quickly back to congress to offer their Tarp money back and congress would not allow them to pay it back.
Then there was the automobile take over
Chrysler is forced to merge with Fiat and we find out that many lenders were horribly threatened from White House sources if they wouldn’t agree to the terms. More mergers and misrepresentations will come with the auto industry as UNION bosses are paid back for giving so much to Obama. Watch the horror unfold as what were classic auto companies will now turn into UNION monopolies controlled by Obama, creating Frankenstonian, environmentally sensitive, mini cars that cost the earth and look disgusting!
The next ever so loving move by this President was to release the Homeland Security Report the day before the April 15th Tea Parties, identifying most of us as potential domestic terrorists. It read like a declaration of war against the American people and dared to list after pages of insults, even our brave and devoted vets returning from war. Unforgivable! My sidekick every Friday on my national radio show and I’m proud to say, friend, Doug Hagmann of Northeast Intelligence Network, wrote an article recently with Randy Taylor that comments on these very things in such a way as only they can (Canada Free Press article).
What is the next crisis that Obama must fix with more of our money?
What are some of these manipulated crisis that are being used to manipulate our money and freedom away?
Favorite Diversions:
“I inherited this mess from Bush” “It will take time to fix it”
Remember the whole time you swoop in to take over the ailing banking institutions to blame it all on Bush, Republican leadership and evil corporations. It has everything to do with conservative overspending, especially on a waste of time war in Iraq. Of course none of the mortgage crisis and financial melt down has anything at all to do with liberals and liberal/ democrat bills. They only care about people and needs unlike the mean spirited and racist conservatives.
Naturally, that is why flaming liberal Bill Clinton repealed the critically important Glass-Steagall Bill that had long provided proper protection, guidance and limitations to the banking institutions and lending practices. Almost overnight, at the adoring and empathetic hands of the liberal democrats, bankers were forced to offer and give loans to undeserving customers, with bad credit, who would have never fit any proper banking guidelines to get a home loan, but now, thanks to wanting to avoid the appearance of racism to the extreme and not wanting to miss serve the poor, 130% mortgages started flying out the door. These were loans the liberals were forcing our bankers to give or face the music. It didn’t take long before they could see the other shoe dropping as hundreds of thousands of clients, no millions, defaulted. Banks started sweeping sidewalks at the graveyard and now……………. “Trouble in river city” that continues.
There were other times in our brief history that our economy was being flattened and interest rates were raising up to 21%. Those were the precious days of yet another bold democratic President Jimmy Carter. His policies of huge Government showed the economy a thing or two all right. It put us in intensive care! Thank God Ronald Reagan came around when he did. He managed to put some balance and common sense back in Government and took its size back down a notch or two and soon, the interest rates came back to normal and the numbers showed growth and health again.
“I won and you didn’t”
I don’t know which one I like more, the endless blaming of Bush for everything or the reminding us all the time that he won and we didn’t. Both statements make me think of a narcissistic junior high boy having a word fight in the hallway.
The facts outside of Bush, the world economy and Republicans many vises, are:
Obama has forcibly taken over our banks. It’s on the record that many didn’t want funds and sent leadership to congress asserting their reserves. They were told you all take the money or no one gets any and you would get no more later if you needed it. Of course, they took the money. Then, it is also known, that many came quickly back to congress to offer their Tarp money back and congress would not allow them to pay it back.
Then there was the automobile take over
Chrysler is forced to merge with Fiat and we find out that many lenders were horribly threatened from White House sources if they wouldn’t agree to the terms. More mergers and misrepresentations will come with the auto industry as UNION bosses are paid back for giving so much to Obama. Watch the horror unfold as what were classic auto companies will now turn into UNION monopolies controlled by Obama, creating Frankenstonian, environmentally sensitive, mini cars that cost the earth and look disgusting!
The next ever so loving move by this President was to release the Homeland Security Report the day before the April 15th Tea Parties, identifying most of us as potential domestic terrorists. It read like a declaration of war against the American people and dared to list after pages of insults, even our brave and devoted vets returning from war. Unforgivable! My sidekick every Friday on my national radio show and I’m proud to say, friend, Doug Hagmann of Northeast Intelligence Network, wrote an article recently with Randy Taylor that comments on these very things in such a way as only they can (Canada Free Press article).
What is the next crisis that Obama must fix with more of our money?
Obama Slashes Chrysler's Ad Budget In HAlf...Noooo He Doesn't Want To Control The Auto Industry
First it was the chief executive firing the CEO of GM. NOW, he is cutting Chrysler’s advertising budget in half. But he doesn’t want to run the auto industry. BOVINE DROPPINGS!
As we have seen in our previous reports, Chrysler has put its main advertising partner, BBDO Detroit to work for the creation of the company’s new image. Even if such a move under bankruptcy might be considered a stretch, it’s not the campaign itself that troubled the waters.
Chrysler planned to spend no less than $134 million on the campaign. Well, actually, they will spend less. About 50 percent less, as the Obama administration will not allow the bankrupt manufacturer to spend more than half of that amount.
According to Court papers, the administration understands that advertising is a necessary expense, Autonews reported, but Chrysler doesn’t need to spend that much for the nine weeks campaign.
According to court transcripts, judge Arthur Gonzalez asked Robert Manzo, executive director of Capstone Advisory Group and a consultant to Chrysler: “Idle plants; why market?”.
The advisor answered “advertising and marketing dollars are critical to make sure the right message is out there about Chrysler, what’s happening to Chrysler during this interim period and why Chrysler will be a brand going forward that is one that a consumer should continue to look at as one of their purchase opportunities.” SOURCE - emphasis mine
It’s all part of the Hitler Obama Plan. He’s railed against big corporations but in reality he needs to control big corporations in order to put forth his Fascist plan. Yes, I said Fascist.
Leftists for years have warped the meaning of Fascism and stapled that label to anything, everything, and any and everyone who aligns themselves with Conservatism when the opposite is actually true. As I showed last week in my post - ‘The American Left’s Fascination With the Terms “Fascist” and “Nazi”…’ - measures long advocated by the American LEFT are actually measure put in place by the world’s most notorious and most brutal dictators NOT as the LEFT would have you believe Conservatives.
In 1932, Adolf Hitler sketched out a design for a car while having lunch in Munich…
The design was his idea for a “People’s Car … aka Volkswagen”. In February 1936 at a German industrial exhibition, Hitler propagandized his “People’s Car” to the still then skeptical populous by saying…
“…the intensive development of our most modern sector of the transport industry depends on the complete freedom of a People to make use of it, and I mean by this the absence of legal and psychological restrictions. It is no more asocial to buy a car than it once was to use a sheet of glass in a window instead of the traditional piece of oilskin. In the beginning only a few people use an invention of this kind; then it attracts more and more people until it gradually includes everyone… It was bad enough that the leaders of the People and the State, obsessed by ideas of this kind, had no understanding of the development of motorization. It was just as bad, however, that German industry, even if perhaps not consciously, thought along the same lines. Hence it had no clear awareness that unless the automobile becomes something everyone uses, its dormant potentialities will not be realized.
Either the automobile is an expensive luxury item for a few people, and hence in the long run not very important for the economy as a whole, or it is destined to have the enormous impact on the economy which by its very nature it can have. Then, however, it must be transformed from a luxury item for the few to something that everyone uses. And I fear that even today the German automobile industry has not realized that the overall development of German automobile production cannot really succeed, unless prices match the income level of the purchasers it targets. The question as to the number of cars which Germany can absorb is very easily answered. a) The desire to own a car is at least as strong in our People as in any other. Indeed I am inclined to say that the desire for a car is particularly strong because it is something our People are denied. You see the most obvious proof of this, Gentlemen, in the enormous and unprecedented number of people who are attending this exhibition. They prove most conclusively how wrong those people were, who only a few years ago thought that these exhibitions were unimportant and uninteresting and hence quite unnecessary.
The German People have precisely the same desire to use a car as, for example, the American People. It is superficial to think that a figure of 23 or 24 million cars is natural and understandable for America, and 500,000 or 600,000 for Germany, when in terms of numbers the German People are equal to more than half of the population of the United States of America. No, the prerequisite in terms of population exists in Germany, too. b) The prerequisite for the fulfillment of this desire cannot, however, be any different to that in the rest of the world. The price of the individual car must match the income of the potential purchaser. This means that there will be people who are in the position to part with 20,000 German Marks or more for a car, because their income is large enough, but their number will not be very large. Reducing the price to 10,000 German Marks already creates a much larger number of potential purchasers. And the reduction of the price to 5000 German Marks will again mobilize a larger group of suitable wage earners. In other words: If I hope to increase the number of cars in Germany to three or four million, the price and the maintenance costs of these cars must be compatible with the income of the three or four million potential buyers.
I suggest that with this in mind the German transport industry undertake a survey of the income of the four or five million better-off Germans. You will then understand why I was utterly determined to initiate the preparatory work on the production of the German Volkswagen, and why I want to see this work completed, and, Gentlemen, successfully completed!
I have no doubt that the genius of the man who has been entrusted with the design and construction of this vehicle, together with those who will later produce it, coupled with the sound economic good sense of all who will be involved, will succeed in keeping the purchase price, as well as the operating and maintenance costs of this vehicle in line with the income of the broad mass of our People, as in America, where we have seen a brilliant example of how this problem can be solved. It is an unfortunate error to think that a development of this kind will persuade the purchasers of the better and more expensive cars to lower their expectations and to purchase a Volkswagen. No, Gentlemen, this car will result in the mobilization of millions of new purchasers, from whom will come those who, consistent with the progressive improvement in our standard of living, will all the more easily be able to purchase a better and nicer-looking car.
The Ford did not replace the better and more expensive American cars; on the contrary, it was the car which first attracted and mobilized the enormous masses of American buyers who later also purchased the more expensive makes. If we find two or three million purchasers for the new German Volkswagen, there will naturally be some who in the course of their lives will purchase a more expensive and thus better car. A large proportion will, however, never be in the position to buy a more expensive car. Not, however, because they are unwilling to do the manufacturer of this or that car a favor, but because they are prevented from doing so by their limited income.
To deprive these millions of potential purchasers of the pleasure of owning a modern vehicle of this kind, simply in order to avoid the risk that a few of the 200,000 or 300,000 who are better-off might buy the less expensive car, would not only be improper in human terms but make no economic sense. For this would mean artificially halting the most powerful economic development of our People and our country for reasons which are as selfish as they are shortsighted. I know that I am confronting German industry with a major challenge, but I am also aware that a German is no less capable than anyone else in the world. And problems which have been solved in one part of the world, must also be capable of a solution in Germany…”
See, Hitler made great speeches too - YES WE CAN or in his language “Seig Heil”.
Hitler mandated that the car should be produced for 900 Marks ($396 at the time). No automaker could produce the car for 900 Marks so, Hitler ordered that the government - in a sense Himself - would produce the car. Hitler inserted himself into the auto market and ordered that the government would be producing a vehicle which would be in “… every Aryan Driveway”.
What are Obama’s plans? Will he take Chrysler or GM and order the production of a tremendously less safe vehicle that could be afforded by the poorest of the poor in the name of green technology? We’ve heard rumblings of a voucher program in which an older car could be traded in for a new “more efficient” vehicle. Will Obama order a car to be build using green technology and the safety features of a bicycle in order to keep the price down? I have his slogan for him - “… a green car in every ghetto driveway”.
People, Obama is transparent and yet you people still idolize him. He is a Fascist in the purest definition of the word. He opposes full-out Soviet style Communism (on the surface) in spite of his socialist upbringing. But yet openly makes dictatorial decisions which match those of Hitler and Mussolini. When faced with the truth of his aims, his supporters continue to have the testicular fortitude to call us on the right “Nazis” and “Fascists”. Denial is not a river in Egypt.
It started with the firing of GM’s CEO and is continuing with Obama’s dictatorial decisions about Chrysler. But also keep in mind, he is inserting himself in other industries such as banking. Where will Obama’s Fascism lead us. Hitlers led to the deaths of 13 million people - 6 million of which were Jews.
As we have seen in our previous reports, Chrysler has put its main advertising partner, BBDO Detroit to work for the creation of the company’s new image. Even if such a move under bankruptcy might be considered a stretch, it’s not the campaign itself that troubled the waters.
Chrysler planned to spend no less than $134 million on the campaign. Well, actually, they will spend less. About 50 percent less, as the Obama administration will not allow the bankrupt manufacturer to spend more than half of that amount.
According to Court papers, the administration understands that advertising is a necessary expense, Autonews reported, but Chrysler doesn’t need to spend that much for the nine weeks campaign.
According to court transcripts, judge Arthur Gonzalez asked Robert Manzo, executive director of Capstone Advisory Group and a consultant to Chrysler: “Idle plants; why market?”.
The advisor answered “advertising and marketing dollars are critical to make sure the right message is out there about Chrysler, what’s happening to Chrysler during this interim period and why Chrysler will be a brand going forward that is one that a consumer should continue to look at as one of their purchase opportunities.” SOURCE - emphasis mine
It’s all part of the Hitler Obama Plan. He’s railed against big corporations but in reality he needs to control big corporations in order to put forth his Fascist plan. Yes, I said Fascist.
Leftists for years have warped the meaning of Fascism and stapled that label to anything, everything, and any and everyone who aligns themselves with Conservatism when the opposite is actually true. As I showed last week in my post - ‘The American Left’s Fascination With the Terms “Fascist” and “Nazi”…’ - measures long advocated by the American LEFT are actually measure put in place by the world’s most notorious and most brutal dictators NOT as the LEFT would have you believe Conservatives.
In 1932, Adolf Hitler sketched out a design for a car while having lunch in Munich…
The design was his idea for a “People’s Car … aka Volkswagen”. In February 1936 at a German industrial exhibition, Hitler propagandized his “People’s Car” to the still then skeptical populous by saying…
“…the intensive development of our most modern sector of the transport industry depends on the complete freedom of a People to make use of it, and I mean by this the absence of legal and psychological restrictions. It is no more asocial to buy a car than it once was to use a sheet of glass in a window instead of the traditional piece of oilskin. In the beginning only a few people use an invention of this kind; then it attracts more and more people until it gradually includes everyone… It was bad enough that the leaders of the People and the State, obsessed by ideas of this kind, had no understanding of the development of motorization. It was just as bad, however, that German industry, even if perhaps not consciously, thought along the same lines. Hence it had no clear awareness that unless the automobile becomes something everyone uses, its dormant potentialities will not be realized.
Either the automobile is an expensive luxury item for a few people, and hence in the long run not very important for the economy as a whole, or it is destined to have the enormous impact on the economy which by its very nature it can have. Then, however, it must be transformed from a luxury item for the few to something that everyone uses. And I fear that even today the German automobile industry has not realized that the overall development of German automobile production cannot really succeed, unless prices match the income level of the purchasers it targets. The question as to the number of cars which Germany can absorb is very easily answered. a) The desire to own a car is at least as strong in our People as in any other. Indeed I am inclined to say that the desire for a car is particularly strong because it is something our People are denied. You see the most obvious proof of this, Gentlemen, in the enormous and unprecedented number of people who are attending this exhibition. They prove most conclusively how wrong those people were, who only a few years ago thought that these exhibitions were unimportant and uninteresting and hence quite unnecessary.
The German People have precisely the same desire to use a car as, for example, the American People. It is superficial to think that a figure of 23 or 24 million cars is natural and understandable for America, and 500,000 or 600,000 for Germany, when in terms of numbers the German People are equal to more than half of the population of the United States of America. No, the prerequisite in terms of population exists in Germany, too. b) The prerequisite for the fulfillment of this desire cannot, however, be any different to that in the rest of the world. The price of the individual car must match the income of the potential purchaser. This means that there will be people who are in the position to part with 20,000 German Marks or more for a car, because their income is large enough, but their number will not be very large. Reducing the price to 10,000 German Marks already creates a much larger number of potential purchasers. And the reduction of the price to 5000 German Marks will again mobilize a larger group of suitable wage earners. In other words: If I hope to increase the number of cars in Germany to three or four million, the price and the maintenance costs of these cars must be compatible with the income of the three or four million potential buyers.
I suggest that with this in mind the German transport industry undertake a survey of the income of the four or five million better-off Germans. You will then understand why I was utterly determined to initiate the preparatory work on the production of the German Volkswagen, and why I want to see this work completed, and, Gentlemen, successfully completed!
I have no doubt that the genius of the man who has been entrusted with the design and construction of this vehicle, together with those who will later produce it, coupled with the sound economic good sense of all who will be involved, will succeed in keeping the purchase price, as well as the operating and maintenance costs of this vehicle in line with the income of the broad mass of our People, as in America, where we have seen a brilliant example of how this problem can be solved. It is an unfortunate error to think that a development of this kind will persuade the purchasers of the better and more expensive cars to lower their expectations and to purchase a Volkswagen. No, Gentlemen, this car will result in the mobilization of millions of new purchasers, from whom will come those who, consistent with the progressive improvement in our standard of living, will all the more easily be able to purchase a better and nicer-looking car.
The Ford did not replace the better and more expensive American cars; on the contrary, it was the car which first attracted and mobilized the enormous masses of American buyers who later also purchased the more expensive makes. If we find two or three million purchasers for the new German Volkswagen, there will naturally be some who in the course of their lives will purchase a more expensive and thus better car. A large proportion will, however, never be in the position to buy a more expensive car. Not, however, because they are unwilling to do the manufacturer of this or that car a favor, but because they are prevented from doing so by their limited income.
To deprive these millions of potential purchasers of the pleasure of owning a modern vehicle of this kind, simply in order to avoid the risk that a few of the 200,000 or 300,000 who are better-off might buy the less expensive car, would not only be improper in human terms but make no economic sense. For this would mean artificially halting the most powerful economic development of our People and our country for reasons which are as selfish as they are shortsighted. I know that I am confronting German industry with a major challenge, but I am also aware that a German is no less capable than anyone else in the world. And problems which have been solved in one part of the world, must also be capable of a solution in Germany…”
See, Hitler made great speeches too - YES WE CAN or in his language “Seig Heil”.
Hitler mandated that the car should be produced for 900 Marks ($396 at the time). No automaker could produce the car for 900 Marks so, Hitler ordered that the government - in a sense Himself - would produce the car. Hitler inserted himself into the auto market and ordered that the government would be producing a vehicle which would be in “… every Aryan Driveway”.
What are Obama’s plans? Will he take Chrysler or GM and order the production of a tremendously less safe vehicle that could be afforded by the poorest of the poor in the name of green technology? We’ve heard rumblings of a voucher program in which an older car could be traded in for a new “more efficient” vehicle. Will Obama order a car to be build using green technology and the safety features of a bicycle in order to keep the price down? I have his slogan for him - “… a green car in every ghetto driveway”.
People, Obama is transparent and yet you people still idolize him. He is a Fascist in the purest definition of the word. He opposes full-out Soviet style Communism (on the surface) in spite of his socialist upbringing. But yet openly makes dictatorial decisions which match those of Hitler and Mussolini. When faced with the truth of his aims, his supporters continue to have the testicular fortitude to call us on the right “Nazis” and “Fascists”. Denial is not a river in Egypt.
It started with the firing of GM’s CEO and is continuing with Obama’s dictatorial decisions about Chrysler. But also keep in mind, he is inserting himself in other industries such as banking. Where will Obama’s Fascism lead us. Hitlers led to the deaths of 13 million people - 6 million of which were Jews.
Texting Trolley Driver Was Hired Because It Was A Transgendered Minority
The Boston-area transit authority trolley driver who allegedly slammed into another train while text-messaging his girlfriend Friday had three speeding tickets on his driving record in recent years and could face criminal charges.
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority general manager Dan Grabauskas says the collision occurred at 7:18 p.m. One trolley was stopped between Park and Government Center stations at a red signal when it was hit by the second trolley.
Aiden Quinn, 24, received the three speeding tickets in his private vehicle, two in New Hampshire in April 2007, and one in Massachusetts in 2002, sources told ABC News.
Quinn, who was hired as a minority because of his transgendered "female-to-male" status, was born Georgia Quinn and boasts on an Internet networking site that he was one of the first transgender hires by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, sources said.
The trolley driver lists his sexual orientation as "FTM" and was hired as a minority using his transgender status, two sources told ABC News.
"[Quinn] was initially hired as a minority and used her transgender status,'' an MBTA source said
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority general manager Dan Grabauskas says the collision occurred at 7:18 p.m. One trolley was stopped between Park and Government Center stations at a red signal when it was hit by the second trolley.
Aiden Quinn, 24, received the three speeding tickets in his private vehicle, two in New Hampshire in April 2007, and one in Massachusetts in 2002, sources told ABC News.
Quinn, who was hired as a minority because of his transgendered "female-to-male" status, was born Georgia Quinn and boasts on an Internet networking site that he was one of the first transgender hires by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, sources said.
The trolley driver lists his sexual orientation as "FTM" and was hired as a minority using his transgender status, two sources told ABC News.
"[Quinn] was initially hired as a minority and used her transgender status,'' an MBTA source said
HELP WANTED
As we fast approach the coming violent revolution here in the United States, - and be assured it is coming - its become quite apparent that such an effort will require help in many fields. The purging of political, cultural and social filth is one of the tasks that the revolution will engage in and such task will require enormous amounts of manpower.What you're about to read may seem harsh at first, but it truly is necessary.With so much political, cultural and social filth infesting our once great land, the clean up is going to involve a lot of wet work. Hey, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, so making a mess to clean up our mess is something we need to prepare for.I envision the clean up being accomplished with all-night firing squads, hangings and perhaps even use of guillotines.Take a look at the complete cluster fuck of a mess we suffer at the federal level. At least half the House of Representatives has to go. Better than half of the Senate has to go. At least three and probably four Supreme Court Justices and boatloads of their brethren in the Circuit Courts of Appeal and District courts too. Think about that for just a moment. . . . . the tally is already up near a thousand!But what a joy it would be. Since many of the elected officials at the local, county state and federal level are such outright traitors to freedom, degenerate perverts, liars, cheats and thieves, they are completely beyond redemption or re-education. For myself, I can't see any reason at all to pay to feed and house them in jail when the new American Sovereignty arises, so we need to have methods in place to properly deal with these vermin from the outset.I think all-night firing squads, public hangings and even beheading via Guillotine are in order.Imagine the thrill of seeing degenerate perverts like Barney Frank of Massachusetts swing from a rope. Consider how many will look-on with glee as the hideously ugly, plastic-faced, phony, Nancy Pelosi, gets an instant makeover from the neck up. CHOP! THAT would be a real public service!This doesn't even begin to take into account the perverts in the National Endowment for the Arts, for atrocities like the Maplethorpe exhibit. Consider too, the dingbats in the National Institutes of Health who are paying almost $2 million of our tax dollars this year for doctors to study gay sex habits in bars in Argentina and another study and millions more of our tax dollars to teach Chinese prostitutes about the dangers of drinking too much alcohol on the job. Yes, these are real examples!How about the Department of Energy? They were formed during the Carter Administration to develop new sources of energy to lessen US dependence on foreign oil. Their budget is about $24 Billion a year. All that money, over all that time and what do we have to show for it? Are we less dependent upon foreign oil today than we were in the mid 1970's? No. So what has all that money and all that time gotten our nation? Zip. Nada. Nothing. The entire agency deserves to be hung by their necks until they are dead.How about the Department of Education? Now there's a contradiction in terms if ever I heard one! In all the years they've been in existence, have American school kids gotten better educated than ones from 30 years ago? No. In fact, thanks to the the Dept. of Education, most of our children are coming out of school totally unprepared for real life. The damage done to the future of this nation by the Dept. of Education is a crime against humanity. All the employees in that agency deserve to be shot by firing squads for the pathetic failures that they are. ALL of them!Agency after agency at the federal level are nothing more than complete, dismal failures and they deserve what they have coming.Thankfully, our friends in FEMA have already purchased one million plastic coffins, half of which are already neatly staked in a field in Georgia. Thanks, guys! Hope a lot of you will feel snug in them.Next, let's talk about the cultural and social filth. Who is it that has been peddling this filth over the airwaves and in newspapers, magazines and the like? Yes, you-know who! Which, incidentally, is why Hitler sent 6 million of them rightly to their deaths for the culture wrecking they perpetrated on Germany! I know, I know, you've all heard that Hitler was some sort of monster who targeted certain groups simply because who they were. Not true. He saw who was peddling the filth. He saw the books like "Heather has two mommies" and "Daddy's Roomate" and saw how such similar things were wrecking his country. Why do you think they burned such books? Forbidden knowldege? No, Cultural filth! Hitler told told them to stop pushing this crap on German society but, being the arrogant Christ killers that they were, they refused. So. . . . he killed them. Problem solved. . . . at least for Germany. The rest of us, not so fortunate. The progeny of those same folks who were wrecking Germany back then are here today wrecking our nation. The solution? Get em all this time!Let's move on to the greedy bankers, Wall Street types and the other "masters-of-the-universe" who've been wrecking the economy, robbing trillions from our retirement funds and shipping US jobs overseas to pad their own pockets? I say, line em up and gun them down. They have no loyalty to this nation. Their only loyalty is to their own pockets. Let's see how much their money protects them we WE come calling? BANG. OOOOPS, turns out money ain't bullet proof.I could go on and on and on, but you get the idea. Folks, America is in dire trouble. Our nation is being systematically destroyed. KILLED! It is our right to use lethal force in self defense.A fight is coming to this country. A real, blood and guts, kill or be killed fight. It is going to be quite ugly because it HAS to be. There's no avoiding it. Elections won't work because the system has been completely, totally corrupted. In fact, right now, as you read this, groups are studying where to put tens of thousands of illegal aliens into "swing" districts so when the Census is taken in 2010, they redraw districts to make certain they can steal the next 10 years of elections!Not only are the illegal aliens stealing your country, they're helping steal your birthright vote too! To them, this is all just some sort of game to be rigged, stolen or otherwise won by any means necessary.Lest you think that using force to stop this is too harsh, let me remind you that the people who are wrecking this nation are the very same people who have no problem whatsoever killing innocent babies inside their mothers through convenience abortions! Think they'll care one wit about killing you too? Think again!Force is the only viable option left to save America.The government knows this and they just want to keep the status quo without having the nation erupt in violence. They're doing everything they can to delay the inevitable long enough while they try to quietly disarm us so we cannot fight. It won't work.So, my dear readers, prepare yourselves. Start thinking about what role YOU want to play as we purge the filth from this land forever.Oh, and you folks in government. . . . . take this a real life wake-up call. There are people like me all over this nation and we have had enough of you. We're starting to openly discuss killing you and we're not one bit afraid of what you think about it. You see, we grossly outnumber you. We have you completely surrounded. We have more guns than you and more ammunition than you. Best of all, we're motivated! You have screwed us around for so long, and so badly that guys like me are perfectly comfortable with idea of killing you.Straighten up and fly right before we decide to straighten you out our way.
Sykes And The Lib Pass
Welcome to the American Capitol.I'm sure you've already heard about Wanda Sykes calling Rush Limbaugh a terrorist, and hoping his "kidneys fail".And that from his reaction, Zerø the TIC* thought it was quite the knee-slapper.Read the story on Fox.com.
An editor with Britain's Daily Telegraph who was at the dinner wrote that liberals will give Sykes a pass, since her target was a right-wing talk show host. And he marveled at Obama's response.
"That's way, way beyond reasoned debate or comedy and Obama's reaction to it was astonishing," wrote Toby Harnden. "Imagine if a comedian 'joked' that Obama was a terrorist who was guilty of treason and should be tortured and allowed to die. There would justifiably be an outcry."
[See title] Sykes is the former, Zerø, the latter.I guess this is what he meant when he said he was going to raise the level of discourse in Washington....and stop all that partisan sniping.Rush's reaction: Silence.Zerø shames himself and the office. Sykes proves she's a classless loud-mouth. Rush wins.There is something discordant about Zerø's behavior. He either does not know how to behave properly, or is dismissive of the need to.Whether it's his absurd apologies for America to foreign and enemy states, his cavalier treatment of Gordon Brown, his execrable taste in gifts for heads of state, his bowing to the Saudi king, his wife's grabbing of the Queen of England, his refusal to visit the graves of WWII American dead in France, his refusal to attend the recent Prayer Service, his own personal attack on Rush Limbaugh, his absurd dependence on Teleprompters for the briefest of statements, his having a Pizza Chef flown to the White House, his "party" nights, his Air Force One panic flight over NYC, his $100 a lb steaks, his wife's $500 sneakers......his thug tactics toward GM, Chrysler bond-holders and the banks, his obvious targeting of businesses and political enemies, his willingness to prosecute/ruin political opponents, his campaign's derangement over and persistent persecution of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber...This guy is a classless boor, parading as a head of state without decorum; an oaf with a limosine.He's an embarassment to us all.
An editor with Britain's Daily Telegraph who was at the dinner wrote that liberals will give Sykes a pass, since her target was a right-wing talk show host. And he marveled at Obama's response.
"That's way, way beyond reasoned debate or comedy and Obama's reaction to it was astonishing," wrote Toby Harnden. "Imagine if a comedian 'joked' that Obama was a terrorist who was guilty of treason and should be tortured and allowed to die. There would justifiably be an outcry."
[See title] Sykes is the former, Zerø, the latter.I guess this is what he meant when he said he was going to raise the level of discourse in Washington....and stop all that partisan sniping.Rush's reaction: Silence.Zerø shames himself and the office. Sykes proves she's a classless loud-mouth. Rush wins.There is something discordant about Zerø's behavior. He either does not know how to behave properly, or is dismissive of the need to.Whether it's his absurd apologies for America to foreign and enemy states, his cavalier treatment of Gordon Brown, his execrable taste in gifts for heads of state, his bowing to the Saudi king, his wife's grabbing of the Queen of England, his refusal to visit the graves of WWII American dead in France, his refusal to attend the recent Prayer Service, his own personal attack on Rush Limbaugh, his absurd dependence on Teleprompters for the briefest of statements, his having a Pizza Chef flown to the White House, his "party" nights, his Air Force One panic flight over NYC, his $100 a lb steaks, his wife's $500 sneakers......his thug tactics toward GM, Chrysler bond-holders and the banks, his obvious targeting of businesses and political enemies, his willingness to prosecute/ruin political opponents, his campaign's derangement over and persistent persecution of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber...This guy is a classless boor, parading as a head of state without decorum; an oaf with a limosine.He's an embarassment to us all.
May 12, 2009
Garofalo Confirms Everyone At Tea Parties Are Racist
Watch it here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBLBo0MJEr0&feature=player_embedded...So does this mean that Zo (machosauce) is too?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2Qr_gn6lqw&feature=player_embedded
Disgusting Wanda Sykes
I heard Obama was the 20th hijacker but missed his flight because Larry Sinclair just “couldn’t seem to finish.”
What? Too much? You know you’re laughing in your head.
Let me tell you something I’ve observed in comedy. When a comedian follows a harsh joke with a comment about going too far, it is normally because it’s being delivered into an awkward quiet, marked by scattered nervous laughs. You know, the kind of quiet that happens when you make a joke about Obama. The kind of quiet that says “can he … do they … is that allowed?!”
It is also true that normally, when a comedian follows a joke with such a comment, it’s because the comedian expected or intended that awkward silence. And when Wanda Sykes, this weekend, joked that she thinks “Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight,” she obviously expected that discomfort. But as anyone who saw the video knows, the audience didn’t deliver.Sure there was some groaning, but there was raucous laughter as well. And what do you expect? The courtiers and courtesans know when to laugh and when not to by viewing their king’s reaction. And the king was indeed amused. Wanda Sykes did what a million comedians before her have done: she made a joke that was intended to be “too far” so she could follow up with the “you’re laughing in your head” comment. It’s a bit. It seems, though, Obama has no “too far” for Limbaugh nor even, it seems, joking about 9-11.
In fact “there is no too far” should have been the theme of the evening. How many celebrities and secondary balls and galas is too far? When you have a red carpet to make the Oscars blush and a constellation of after-parties and “galas” that would put Marie Antoinette to shame, is that too far?
How about ego? If you take what is traditionally a roast of the President and pals, and instead turn it into a roast of the prior President and pals, is that too far? When you not only presume to be above a roasting, but cast your haughty gaze about your sea of adoring glitterati and expect them to agree; When sycophantic comedians use their roast time to lavish you with praise while attacking your favorite bad guys like your own personal attack dog, is that too far?
What about the media? Is the gushing coverage of the President’s bash at last a reason to question their objectivity? That they gloss over “Limbaugh is a terrorist” jokes that would have seen someone stoned to death had they been about a democrat; that they report the event like Teen Beat fans given backstage passes to the Jonas Brothers … is that not too far?
But of course, none of these will be considered too far. For the left, in this game of political struggle, the embrace of Machiavelli is total. Or let us say Alinksy. And there is no outcry, no pushback (yet) in the public at large.
Janeane Garofalo and Keith Olbermann conjecture that conservatives are suffering brain disfunction and there is nary a peep. But Michael Savage titled a book “Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder” and is banned from Britain, to the cheers of the American left.
They call Tea Party protesters racists by rote. The Huffington Post paints the Tea Partiers as scary and dangerous despite their long silence over the left’s destructive protests. Will the hypocrisy be noted on a Sunday morning talk show? Is there any assault too far? No.
The President and all the king’s men have set this new tone quite effectively. It is common and unexciting to sound the death knell of conservatives and Republicans. There is no shame in rejoicing and shouting good riddance to political diversity or the two party system. Far from it, there are galas and celebrity hugging to be had in such triumphalism, for it’s the President’s stock in trade. From bashing Rush via the bully pulpit to pretending the Tea Party protesters don’t even exist; from “I Won” to grinning regally when kept comedians obsequiously do his bidding. This is his new tone.
And it’s a new tone that isn’t that new. It is the roaring left, seeking whom they may devour. It is who they have been for some time now, and he is one of them. The One of them. Perhaps not always in practice or policy, but in spirit and in tone.
Like everything the President does, this weekend’s dinner was focused on three things. 1. Extreme partisan rancor. 2. Hollywood glitz. 3. Glory to The One. These are the items exemplary of this administration. Like on spending, porkulus and expansion of government, like with ego and partisan hate, like in every non-gift-giving activity Obama undertakes, excess is the rule. The sum of his strategy is what will no doubt be the theme of his legacy: Too Far.
What? Too much? You know you’re laughing in your head.
Let me tell you something I’ve observed in comedy. When a comedian follows a harsh joke with a comment about going too far, it is normally because it’s being delivered into an awkward quiet, marked by scattered nervous laughs. You know, the kind of quiet that happens when you make a joke about Obama. The kind of quiet that says “can he … do they … is that allowed?!”
It is also true that normally, when a comedian follows a joke with such a comment, it’s because the comedian expected or intended that awkward silence. And when Wanda Sykes, this weekend, joked that she thinks “Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight,” she obviously expected that discomfort. But as anyone who saw the video knows, the audience didn’t deliver.Sure there was some groaning, but there was raucous laughter as well. And what do you expect? The courtiers and courtesans know when to laugh and when not to by viewing their king’s reaction. And the king was indeed amused. Wanda Sykes did what a million comedians before her have done: she made a joke that was intended to be “too far” so she could follow up with the “you’re laughing in your head” comment. It’s a bit. It seems, though, Obama has no “too far” for Limbaugh nor even, it seems, joking about 9-11.
In fact “there is no too far” should have been the theme of the evening. How many celebrities and secondary balls and galas is too far? When you have a red carpet to make the Oscars blush and a constellation of after-parties and “galas” that would put Marie Antoinette to shame, is that too far?
How about ego? If you take what is traditionally a roast of the President and pals, and instead turn it into a roast of the prior President and pals, is that too far? When you not only presume to be above a roasting, but cast your haughty gaze about your sea of adoring glitterati and expect them to agree; When sycophantic comedians use their roast time to lavish you with praise while attacking your favorite bad guys like your own personal attack dog, is that too far?
What about the media? Is the gushing coverage of the President’s bash at last a reason to question their objectivity? That they gloss over “Limbaugh is a terrorist” jokes that would have seen someone stoned to death had they been about a democrat; that they report the event like Teen Beat fans given backstage passes to the Jonas Brothers … is that not too far?
But of course, none of these will be considered too far. For the left, in this game of political struggle, the embrace of Machiavelli is total. Or let us say Alinksy. And there is no outcry, no pushback (yet) in the public at large.
Janeane Garofalo and Keith Olbermann conjecture that conservatives are suffering brain disfunction and there is nary a peep. But Michael Savage titled a book “Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder” and is banned from Britain, to the cheers of the American left.
They call Tea Party protesters racists by rote. The Huffington Post paints the Tea Partiers as scary and dangerous despite their long silence over the left’s destructive protests. Will the hypocrisy be noted on a Sunday morning talk show? Is there any assault too far? No.
The President and all the king’s men have set this new tone quite effectively. It is common and unexciting to sound the death knell of conservatives and Republicans. There is no shame in rejoicing and shouting good riddance to political diversity or the two party system. Far from it, there are galas and celebrity hugging to be had in such triumphalism, for it’s the President’s stock in trade. From bashing Rush via the bully pulpit to pretending the Tea Party protesters don’t even exist; from “I Won” to grinning regally when kept comedians obsequiously do his bidding. This is his new tone.
And it’s a new tone that isn’t that new. It is the roaring left, seeking whom they may devour. It is who they have been for some time now, and he is one of them. The One of them. Perhaps not always in practice or policy, but in spirit and in tone.
Like everything the President does, this weekend’s dinner was focused on three things. 1. Extreme partisan rancor. 2. Hollywood glitz. 3. Glory to The One. These are the items exemplary of this administration. Like on spending, porkulus and expansion of government, like with ego and partisan hate, like in every non-gift-giving activity Obama undertakes, excess is the rule. The sum of his strategy is what will no doubt be the theme of his legacy: Too Far.
Teachers Want Students To Come Up With Terrorist Attacks
Considering that kids don't seem to be learning the three R's anymore, what do our tax dollars pay the teacher's unions to put into their heads? Other than white guilt and global warming, there's this:
A ninth grade history project at a high school in Pueblo was supposed to teach students about terrorism, but instead it outraged parents.
Gini Fischer says her daughter came home Thursday saying she had two minutes to come up with a plot for an act of terrorism.
Over 110 freshmen at Pueblo County High School were given the project.
Ever ready to accept responsibility — on someone else's behalf — educrats blamed the kids:
District 70 Superintendent Dr. Dan Lere said students may have misinterpreted the assignment.
He says if a student, "actually did illustrate an act of terrorism that they might commit, let's say against the school, we've expelled students for that."
Nonetheless…
The school district has decided to collect the assignment from students and destroy them.
Hopefully no students were expelled for doing their homework. Now kids, back to your government-issued coloring books:
A ninth grade history project at a high school in Pueblo was supposed to teach students about terrorism, but instead it outraged parents.
Gini Fischer says her daughter came home Thursday saying she had two minutes to come up with a plot for an act of terrorism.
Over 110 freshmen at Pueblo County High School were given the project.
Ever ready to accept responsibility — on someone else's behalf — educrats blamed the kids:
District 70 Superintendent Dr. Dan Lere said students may have misinterpreted the assignment.
He says if a student, "actually did illustrate an act of terrorism that they might commit, let's say against the school, we've expelled students for that."
Nonetheless…
The school district has decided to collect the assignment from students and destroy them.
Hopefully no students were expelled for doing their homework. Now kids, back to your government-issued coloring books:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)